Speaker summary
36%2 analyzed articles/videos171.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Bier results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 354 faulty-reasoning hits from 171.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (24,125 of 28,333 speakers). This David Bier is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group.
David Bier
Speaker details