Speaker summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dave Rader results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (11,033 of 37,854 speakers). This Dave Rader is worse (more manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group.
Dave Rader
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠71%Dave Rader (selected)50%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos