Speaker summary
ā 47%1 analyzed article/video46.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Darline Graham results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, In-Group Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 175 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ā 75% (4,891 of 19,395 speakers). This Darline Graham is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group.
Darline Graham
Speaker details