Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video1,420.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Darby Hickey results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 151.792 hits. Analysis detected 1,356.751 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,420.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (41,647 of 41,931 speakers). This Darby Hickey is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group.
Darby Hickey
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠1%Darby Hickey (selected)3%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 1,420.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751000.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.4%6.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 4.3%4.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos