Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video32 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danny Pearlstein results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 48 faulty-reasoning hits from 32 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (12,781 of 45,144 speakers). This Danny Pearlstein is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
Danny Pearlstein
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠72%Danny Pearlstein (selected)50%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 32
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.7% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos32 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos