Speaker summary
43%1 analyzed article/video256 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Sternoff results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), In-Group Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 95 hits. Analysis detected 405 faulty-reasoning hits from 256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.3% and a BS Rank of 15% (24,337 of 28,364 speakers). This Daniel Sternoff is better (less manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group.
Daniel Sternoff
Speaker details