Speaker summary
49%2 analyzed articles/videos186.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Siad results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Confirmation Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 56.1% saturation with 148 hits. Analysis detected 275 faulty-reasoning hits from 186.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.4% and a BS Rank of 28% (20,675 of 28,364 speakers). This Daniel Siad is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Daniel Siad
Speaker details