Speaker summary
49%3 analyzed articles/videos134.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Rosen results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 66.8% saturation with 143 hits. Analysis detected 351.353 faulty-reasoning hits from 134.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 28.2% and a BS Rank of 46% (15,205 of 27,743 speakers). This Daniel Rosen is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Daniel Rosen
Speaker details