Speaker summary
97%1 analyzed article/video6 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Nava-Sanchez results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Negativity Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 6 hits. Analysis detected 6 faulty-reasoning hits from 6 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 97% (1,039 of 28,364 speakers). This Daniel Nava-Sanchez is worse (more manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group.
Daniel Nava-Sanchez
Speaker details