Speaker summary
97%1 analyzed article/video29 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Ikenson results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 58 faulty-reasoning hits from 29 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 97% (924 of 23,852 speakers). This Daniel Ikenson is worse (more manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group.
Daniel Ikenson
Speaker details