Speaker summary
54%1 analyzed article/video70 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Finn results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 87.1% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 122 faulty-reasoning hits from 70 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 87.1% and a BS Rank of 82% (4,318 of 23,518 speakers). This Daniel Finn is worse (more manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group.
Daniel Finn
Speaker details