Speaker summary
53%1 analyzed article/video29.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Ahmad results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 44 faulty-reasoning hits from 29.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 97% (1,295 of 37,786 speakers). This Daniel Ahmad is worse (more manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group.
Daniel Ahmad
Speaker details