Speaker summary
97%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dana Williamson results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Quote-first Misdirection, and Unattributed Quote, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 116 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of 70% (8,650 of 28,364 speakers). This Dana Williamson is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Dana Williamson
Speaker details