Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video84 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dana Cole results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Confirmation Bias, and Burden of Proof, with Special Pleading as the most egregious example at 50.8% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 159 faulty-reasoning hits from 84 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,654 of 29,215 speakers). This Dana Cole is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Dana Cole
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠57%Dana Cole (selected)38%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 84
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos