Speaker summary
66%2 analyzed articles/videos167.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Shapiro results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 32.3% saturation with 59.637 hits. Analysis detected 422.082 faulty-reasoning hits from 167.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (20,481 of 28,364 speakers). This Dan Shapiro is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Dan Shapiro
Speaker details