Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Rutherford results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 68.6% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 190 faulty-reasoning hits from 68 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,237 of 28,364 speakers). This Dan Rutherford is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Dan Rutherford
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠57%Dan Rutherford (selected)39%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 68
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos