Speaker summary
97%1 analyzed article/video22 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Patterson results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 22 faulty-reasoning hits from 22 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 97% (765 of 19,396 speakers). This Dan Patterson is worse (more manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group.
Dan Patterson
Speaker details