Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video61.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Diorio results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 322 faulty-reasoning hits from 61.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 71.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (4,241 of 19,385 speakers). This Dan Diorio is worse (more manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
Dan Diorio
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠79%Dan Diorio (selected)72%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 61.667
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Analyzed articles and videos