Speaker summary
84%1 analyzed article/video83 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan De Leon results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Authority, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 78.5% saturation with 65.133 hits. Analysis detected 257.948 faulty-reasoning hits from 83 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.3% and a BS Rank of 57% (12,254 of 28,364 speakers). This Dan De Leon is worse (more manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Dan De Leon
Speaker details