Speaker summary
31%1 analyzed article/video64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Conley results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 42.7% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 144 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25% and a BS Rank of 41% (16,810 of 28,364 speakers). This Dan Conley is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Dan Conley
Speaker details