Speaker summary
81%1 analyzed article/video43 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CPUC results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Framing Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 76.7% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 33 faulty-reasoning hits from 43 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 76.7% and a BS Rank of 81% (4,642 of 23,880 speakers). This CPUC is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.
CPUC
Speaker details