Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video18 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Court of Federal Claims results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 18 faulty-reasoning hits from 18 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (772 of 21,084 speakers). This Court of Federal Claims is worse (more manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group.
Court of Federal Claims
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠97%Court of Federal Claims (selected)100%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 18
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos