Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video90 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Councilor Brian Gunn results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 40% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 80 faulty-reasoning hits from 90 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (19,620 of 42,613 speakers). This Councilor Brian Gunn is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Councilor Brian Gunn
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠54%Councilor Brian Gunn (selected)34%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 90
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.0% percentile
33.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos90 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 40.0%40.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 26.7%26.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos