Speaker summary
74%2 analyzed articles/videos350 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Council on Criminal Justice (CCJ) results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, False Dilemma, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 393 faulty-reasoning hits from 350 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.2% and a BS Rank of 12% (25,011 of 28,364 speakers). This Council on Criminal Justice (CCJ) is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
Council on Criminal Justice (CCJ)
Speaker details