Speaker summary
47%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conservation Law Foundation results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon and Self-Serving Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 70% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 84 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70% and a BS Rank of 80% (5,876 of 28,364 speakers). This Conservation Law Foundation is worse (more manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Conservation Law Foundation
Speaker details