Speaker summary
78%1 analyzed article/video26 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Committee to Project Journalists results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 104 faulty-reasoning hits from 26 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 97% (978 of 31,441 speakers). This Committee to Project Journalists is worse (more manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group.
Committee to Project Journalists
Speaker details