Speaker summary
98%1 analyzed article/video21 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CNN commentator Dana Bash results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 63 faulty-reasoning hits from 21 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 98% (1,104 of 37,681 speakers). This CNN commentator Dana Bash is worse (more manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group.
CNN commentator Dana Bash
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
98%CNN commentator Dana Bash (selected)100%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 21
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos