Speaker summary
98%1 analyzed article/video92.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Power results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 79.7% saturation with 102 hits. Analysis detected 367.222 faulty-reasoning hits from 92.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.8% and a BS Rank of 58% (11,921 of 28,364 speakers). This Climate Power is worse (more manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Climate Power
Speaker details