Speaker summary
81%2 analyzed articles/videos108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cleta Mitchell results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Horn Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 234 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (5,602 of 22,592 speakers). This Cleta Mitchell is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Cleta Mitchell
Speaker details