Speaker summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video194.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City of Cleveland results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, False Dilemma, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35.6% saturation with 68.44 hits. Analysis detected 161.558 faulty-reasoning hits from 194.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (28,786 of 45,144 speakers). This City of Cleveland is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
City of Cleveland
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠37%City of Cleveland (selected)22%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 194.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.2% percentile
21.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos194.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 35.6%35.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 35.6%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos