Speaker summary
55%1 analyzed article/video35.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Status Quo Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 67.7% saturation with 28.452 hits. Analysis detected 72.452 faulty-reasoning hits from 35.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 46.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (10,667 of 28,364 speakers). This Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak is worse (more manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak
Speaker details