Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video7 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cindy Ryu results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including In-Group Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 7 hits. Analysis detected 7 faulty-reasoning hits from 7 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (1,020 of 37,455 speakers). This Cindy Ryu is worse (more manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group.
Cindy Ryu
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠98%Cindy Ryu (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 7
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos