Speaker summary
83%1 analyzed article/video185.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chuck Gray results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 37.1% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 597.739 faulty-reasoning hits from 185.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (19,226 of 28,364 speakers). This Chuck Gray is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Chuck Gray
Speaker details