Speaker summary
⁠42%3 analyzed articles/videos112.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Wray results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 44.4% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 160 faulty-reasoning hits from 112.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (31,491 of 44,465 speakers). This Christopher Wray is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
Christopher Wray
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠30%Christopher Wray (selected)18%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 112.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510029.2% percentile
17.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos112.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 44.4%44.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 44.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos