Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video102.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Towler results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 48.3% saturation with 52.144 hits. Analysis detected 195.144 faulty-reasoning hits from 102.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 47.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (15,597 of 45,128 speakers). This Christopher Towler is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Christopher Towler
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠66%Christopher Towler (selected)48%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 102.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510065.4% percentile
47.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos102.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 44.6%44.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 41.1%41.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 48.3%48.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 55.4%55.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 55.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 48.3%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 44.6%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 41.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos