Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christine Fils-Aime results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 89.4% saturation with 46.5 hits. Analysis detected 46.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 52 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 89.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (6,750 of 41,916 speakers). This Christine Fils-Aime is worse (more manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group.
Christine Fils-Aime
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠84%Christine Fils-Aime (selected)90%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 52
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

84% percentile
025507510083.9% percentile
89.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos52 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 89.4%89.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 89.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos