Speaker summary
49%1 analyzed article/video427.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chriselle Lim results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 730.34 faulty-reasoning hits from 427.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,659 of 28,364 speakers). This Chriselle Lim is better (less manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group.
Chriselle Lim
Speaker details