Speaker summary
⁠62%2 analyzed articles/videos97 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Papa results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 73.5% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 171.244 faulty-reasoning hits from 97 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 30.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (22,162 of 45,134 speakers). This Chris Papa is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Chris Papa
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠51%Chris Papa (selected)31%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 97
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510050.9% percentile
30.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos97 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 73.5%73.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 41.0%41.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.5%19.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 73.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 41.0%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos