Speaker summary
99%1 analyzed article/video18 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chennedy Carter results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 36 faulty-reasoning hits from 18 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 98% (961 of 38,012 speakers). This Chennedy Carter is worse (more manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group.
Chennedy Carter
Speaker details