Speaker summary
38%1 analyzed article/video46.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chelsea Janes results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 93 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of 70% (8,555 of 28,364 speakers). This Chelsea Janes is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Chelsea Janes
Speaker details
Total words: 46.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos