Speaker summary
98%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Eisenstein results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma and Framing Effect, with Begging the Question as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 98% (544 of 19,173 speakers). This Charles Eisenstein is worse (more manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group.
Charles Eisenstein
Speaker details