Speaker summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video9.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Clarke results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Red Herring, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 6 hits. Analysis detected 12 faulty-reasoning hits from 9.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 68.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (4,361 of 19,370 speakers). This Charles Clarke is worse (more manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group.
Charles Clarke
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠78%Charles Clarke (selected)69%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 9.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos