Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video41 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chakraborty counsel results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma and Quote-first Misdirection, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 123 faulty-reasoning hits from 41 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (587 of 21,655 speakers). This Chakraborty counsel is worse (more manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group.
Chakraborty counsel
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠98%Chakraborty counsel (selected)100%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 41
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos