Speaker summary
57%3 analyzed articles/videos144 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chad Maisel results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 43.848 hits. Analysis detected 259.696 faulty-reasoning hits from 144 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 26.3% and a BS Rank of 43% (16,279 of 28,364 speakers). This Chad Maisel is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Chad Maisel
Speaker details