Speaker summary
ā 99%1 analyzed article/video29 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Center for Strategic and International Studiesā Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 29 faulty-reasoning hits from 29 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ā 98% (889 of 37,433 speakers). This Center for Strategic and International Studiesā Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative is worse (more manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group.
Center for Strategic and International Studiesā Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative
Speaker details