Speaker summary
64%1 analyzed article/video70.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cedar Rapids Economic Development Center results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Hasty Generalization, and Recency Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 265 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of 76% (7,018 of 28,364 speakers). This Cedar Rapids Economic Development Center is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Cedar Rapids Economic Development Center
Speaker details