Speaker summary
ā 79%1 analyzed article/video62 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cecelia Humiston results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 212 faulty-reasoning hits from 62 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 85.5% and a BS Rank of ā 82% (3,581 of 18,945 speakers). This Cecelia Humiston is worse (more manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group.
Cecelia Humiston
Speaker details