Speaker summary
99%1 analyzed article/video16 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catherine Nakalembe results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Fundamental Attribution Error, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 16 faulty-reasoning hits from 16 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 98% (852 of 37,801 speakers). This Catherine Nakalembe is worse (more manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group.
Catherine Nakalembe
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
98%Catherine Nakalembe (selected)100%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 16
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos