Speaker summary
78%2 analyzed articles/videos211.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carrie DeCell results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 36.7% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 614.264 faulty-reasoning hits from 211.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (33,521 of 45,123 speakers). This Carrie DeCell is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Carrie DeCell
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
26%Carrie DeCell (selected)16%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 211.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510025.7% percentile
15.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos211.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 36.7%36.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 14.7%14.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 36.7%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate