Speaker summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video94.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carolina Landsmann results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 122 faulty-reasoning hits from 94.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (15,777 of 37,502 speakers). This Carolina Landsmann is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Carolina Landsmann
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠58%Carolina Landsmann (selected)38%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 94.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos